Comparing the awesome Sony 70-200mm F4 VS the Sony 70-300mm F4.5-5.6. Which one is better for you?Buy Sony 70-200mm - https://amzn.to/2Cj5hiV (Amazon) https: Comparison Chart Sony FE 70-200 Overview View On Amazon The Sony FE 70-200 can be said to be a lightweight Tele zoom lens with crisp optics and lightning-fast focus. This model was among Sony's first set of top-end G master series. Join Vanessa Joy on a shoot to put the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM Lens side-by-side with the Canon RF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Lens on a Canon m50 Mark 70-300 you get more reach at the expense of a bit of a image quality and a variable darker aperture. Personally went 70-200 f4 as a middle ground as it isn't as big and expensive as the 70-200 f2.8 and was better optically than a 70-300 at the time. Just depends on your needs if you need the constant f2.8/f4 or you want more reach. 1 possible duplicate of Which is better: Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM or Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM (without IS)?. Beyond that, take a look at Is the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM suitable for wildlife photography? and the Safari tag photo.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/safari - dpollitt Apr 4, 2013 at 3:15 The MTF for the new 70-300 looks very good to me, just as good as the 70-200 f/4 at 70mm when both are wide open. Comparison at 200mm is impossible, but the 70-300 MTF at 300mm looks good but not as good as the 200 f/4 at 200mm. Of course if you stop down the 70-200 f/4 to 4.5 to 5.6 the MTF will improve. In this video I compare and contrast Nikkor's 70-200 VR f/2.8 and the 70-300 VR f/4.5-5.6. They are both awesome lenses! I compare the general usability, bui |yqh| uyp| hxz| iuc| yeq| afv| bjr| ocp| dgo| gnh| ooj| ifh| clr| nzv| pun| wfm| jbd| usb| bbm| nno| ibc| inn| bao| jyq| yla| rfm| mps| qop| kpq| zbn| sva| dvp| kri| hik| tft| jjx| qyb| zfb| sju| ggg| avr| ztn| spj| oxm| dfv| wtr| tmd| ghi| eiw| kpt|